The expense of vaping should be decreased for smokers in developing countries as an urgent “human rights issue”, researchers have told a pro-tobacco conference in London.
Addressing a 300-strong audience of tobacco and vaping industry representatives, Helen Redmond, a professional in substance use at Ny University’s Silver School of Social Work, said people in poor countries really should not be priced away from nicotine-based products which could potentially help them to to quit smoking.
Redmond compared the medicinal qualities of nicotine with cannabis and stressed “the need to get vaping for the poorest, who want it most”.
“It’s a human rights issue – being a harm reduction device, prices must come down,” she said. “Nicotine is not a dirty drug, it helps with depression and anxiety.”
Academics in the 2018 global tobacco and nicotine forum called for further research to the possible medical benefits of nicotine as well as a focus on the development of innovative nicotine-based items that can provide a “smoke-free society” and lower the dangerous results of cigarettes.
Viscount Matt Ridley, an author and member of the home of Lords, joined the chorus of experts promoting vaping as a kind of harm reduction, arguing that subjecting electronic cigarette for the same workplace restrictions as smoking may be viewed as an infringement of your individual’s human rights.
“We should treat vaping in the same manner that we treat use of cellphones,” said Ridley. “The best practice to get people to quit [smoking] is to innovate with technology”.
Ridleytold the conference that, regardless of the industry’s continued give attention to promoting nicotine-based products as a kind of harm reduction, public opinion was moving far from vaping because of media “scare stories”. He compared the industry’s plight, specifically in america, to that particular faced by “bootleggers and baptists during prohibition”.
Clive Bates, director of advocacy group Counterfactual, described the views of anti-tobacco campaigners as “hostile and focused”, accusing them of obtaining rival commercial interests having a goal of “annihilating” the market. Warning from the damage due to “those with a vested interest in causing alarm”, he said that although critics laboured to generate evidence to “maintain the narrative of harm”, technological advances meant the transition to vape-type products was very likely to become mandatory rather than voluntary.
You will find 1.1 billion smokers worldwide and 6 million die every year as a direct consequence of smoking. A further 890,000 people annually die prematurely as a result of second-hand smoke, according to the World Health Organization.
A single cigarette contains greater than 200 carcinogenic chemicals, along with the addictive stimulant nicotine. Scientists and academics have to date did not reach agreement on pros and cons of long-term nicotine use.
With a plenary session, clinical psychologist Karl Fagerström called for research to the positive benefits of nicotine, which he believes can assist people struggling with Alzheimer’s and depression. Also, he advised wgferg the industry should move from combustible to nicotine-based products.
“No the first is considering establishing what the advantages of smoking nicotine are,” Fagerström said.
Martin Jarvis, professor of health psychology at University College London, saidthe US was moving towards prohibition-type enforcement, using the Food and Drug Administration willing to reduce the degree of nicotine in cigarettes.
“Society doesn’t understand nicotine,” said Jarvis, “because they think it is particularly bad.”
But Jarvis said “describing nicotine to be addictive is justified”, adding that “80% of smokers wished they never started”.